<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for pfSense Digest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pfsense.org/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pfsense.org</link>
	<description>News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Juriaan Bakx</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-22088</link>
		<dc:creator>Juriaan Bakx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-22088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will upgrading to 2.1RC0 means the next update is RC1 or RTM or does it continuously update like a rolling release till RTM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will upgrading to 2.1RC0 means the next update is RC1 or RTM or does it continuously update like a rolling release till RTM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pfSense 1.2.1-RC2 VMware Appliance available by Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=293&#038;cpage=1#comment-22082</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=293#comment-22082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an OVA on the mirrors. See my last comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an OVA on the mirrors. See my last comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pfSense 1.2.1-RC2 VMware Appliance available by Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=293&#038;cpage=1#comment-22031</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=293#comment-22031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t find a download link for your VMWare appliance. Can you send me a link where I can download the latest VMWare appliance...?

Thx in advance &amp; Bye Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t find a download link for your VMWare appliance. Can you send me a link where I can download the latest VMWare appliance&#8230;?</p>
<p>Thx in advance &amp; Bye Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21930</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 03:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul: that generally isn&#039;t applicable, though that one in particular will have a work around for those it is applicable to in 2.1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: that generally isn&#8217;t applicable, though that one in particular will have a work around for those it is applicable to in 2.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21929</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 03:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephenish: soon. It&#039;s more or less done, being edited now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephenish: soon. It&#8217;s more or less done, being edited now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Stephenish</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21922</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephenish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When can we expect pfSense: A Definitive Users Guide v 2.1?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When can we expect pfSense: A Definitive Users Guide v 2.1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Paul S</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21904</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Fransisco: do you mean that this bug is also solved: http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1629

were one needs to reset the state to enable Asterisk to register again with the provider after the wan connection failed and returned ?

pfSense rulez !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fransisco: do you mean that this bug is also solved: <a href="http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1629" rel="nofollow">http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1629</a></p>
<p>were one needs to reset the state to enable Asterisk to register again with the provider after the wan connection failed and returned ?</p>
<p>pfSense rulez !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Ismashkhy</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismashkhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I deployed the v2.1 on a production environment with 25 users,
I must admit it, the overhaul is non-other-than the &quot;Feel&quot; itself, yup much responsive, and everything is a WAW!,

RC1 must be the much awaited!...

more power guys!.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I deployed the v2.1 on a production environment with 25 users,<br />
I must admit it, the overhaul is non-other-than the &#8220;Feel&#8221; itself, yup much responsive, and everything is a WAW!,</p>
<p>RC1 must be the much awaited!&#8230;</p>
<p>more power guys!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Francisco</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21892</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 02:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is too much.

Thank you.

I have to say that previous betas are working great in my production environments. Now its time to an upgrade and some tests.

Yes, I&#039;ve faith on you.

Asterisk is doing fine behind pfSense with static outbound ports]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too much.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>I have to say that previous betas are working great in my production environments. Now its time to an upgrade and some tests.</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve faith on you.</p>
<p>Asterisk is doing fine behind pfSense with static outbound ports</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2.1 now release candidate tagged by Bill McGonigle</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705&#038;cpage=1#comment-21836</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McGonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=705#comment-21836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, RC means I roll it out for my own sites. :)  3 branches connected via OpenVPN, two running pfSense, one on an Atom with em interfaces and a SATA HD, one on a Via with re interfaces and an ide cf flash card, both using VLAN&#039;s for everything.  Auto-upgraded both from 2.0.3, they rebooted correctly, the OpenVPN&#039;s came back up from all sites, VLAN&#039;s are fine, and I have no issues to report currently.  The web interface is much more responsive on both devices and I just noticed the routing button on the OpenVPN status which is heaven-sent.  Great work, guys!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, RC means I roll it out for my own sites. <img src='http://blog.pfsense.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   3 branches connected via OpenVPN, two running pfSense, one on an Atom with em interfaces and a SATA HD, one on a Via with re interfaces and an ide cf flash card, both using VLAN&#8217;s for everything.  Auto-upgraded both from 2.0.3, they rebooted correctly, the OpenVPN&#8217;s came back up from all sites, VLAN&#8217;s are fine, and I have no issues to report currently.  The web interface is much more responsive on both devices and I just noticed the routing button on the OpenVPN status which is heaven-sent.  Great work, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
