Comments on: 1.2 Release Candidate 3 released! http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152 News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project Thu, 23 May 2013 04:13:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-322 Chris Buechler Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:41:58 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-322 toro: please post and describe your problem on the forum or mailing list so we can look into it. It’s certainly not a widespread issue, and given the minor scope of the changes in this release, it’s probably not a RC3-specific issue.

]]> By: toro http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-321 toro Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:55:22 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-321 i switched back to RC2, RC3 keeps crashing after offloading network devices, dunno what is happening there

]]> By: hadi57 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-309 hadi57 Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:49:11 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-309 excellent work guys, keep it up. hoping for more features in squid like upddatexlrator, addon to ipcop
http://www.advproxy.net/update-accelerator/

]]> By: Arab http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-306 Arab Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:59:58 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-306 Nice work, I wish more features to be added soon like smoothwall features.

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-303 Chris Buechler Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:44:46 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-303 Colin: If you actually read the change list, you would have seen there are NO NEW FEATURES. Those were only bug fixes. In fact there haven’t been new features in any of the RC’s. Scott just takes a template intro for every release and pastes in the change log, I changed the verbiage on this post.

]]> By: javivf’s blog » pfsense 1.2 Release Candidate 3 time! http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-302 javivf’s blog » pfsense 1.2 Release Candidate 3 time! Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:16:17 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-302 [...] El pasado 7 de noviembre anunciaban en su blog el lanzamiento de la nueva RC que nos acerca mas a la version final. Podeis consultar las nuevas features en el articulo del mismo blog [...]

]]> By: Colin http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-297 Colin Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:49:06 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-297 Argh!

Why are you putting “new improvements and features” into a release candidate?

Please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_candidate#Release_candidate

I’ve been waiting to upgrade from 1.0.1 for a long time because I need a full release.

Now I see that instead of working towards a full release you are sneaking (and yes that is the correct word) changes into the release candidates.

Please – fix any major bugs in RC2 and issue it as a full release (or another release candidate) and leave all the new stuff for 1.3 where it belongs.

]]> By: jmorey http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-295 jmorey Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:24:11 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-295 Paul M: Go up a directory level from the updates directory and then into the downloads directory. I think you’ll find what you are looking for there.

]]> By: budman http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-294 budman Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:47:22 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-294 I guess I should of known since it was in snapshots.pfsense.org ;) Thanks for the info though.. I’ll pay more attention to where Im grabbing the updates from next time..

]]> By: budman http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152&cpage=1#comment-293 budman Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:45:00 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=152#comment-293 Does that make a lot of sense?? Releasing versions with the same name on them? If its not RC3, why would you call the file RC3? How about RC2.1 RC2.2, etc. ;) or preRC3build1 ?

I just checked — an the latest version I grabbed, with a build date of built on Wed Nov 7 19:10:57 EST 2007

An the md5 does not match the one listed where you linked too — hehehe guess Im updating again ;)

Please keep up the great work guys — but it might be easier for us if you used a simpler method of keeping track of released builds ;) heheheh

]]>