Comments on: Seven different BSD and Linux firewalls reviewed http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154 News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project Sun, 19 May 2013 21:07:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: PredatoryFern http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-494 PredatoryFern Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:34:11 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-494 I know it’s late, but thanks Chris for correcting the URL.

]]> By: StevenMcCoy http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-482 StevenMcCoy Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:42:16 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-482 Surprisingly no mention of Untangle.
It’s nice to see pfSense in a review, it’s a bit concerning that many of the other firewalls are turning into chunky master-of-none appliances.

]]> By: Wayne http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-411 Wayne Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:38:17 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-411 Just found this, good to know that you’re already linking to my site instead of this bastard who keeps grabbing my content – lol. :)

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-406 Chris Buechler Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:00:41 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-406 Post URL updated, thanks to those who pointed out the correct source. The originally linked URL is what Google Alerts found and that’s how I came across it, I didn’t realize it was plagiarized.

]]> By: PredatoryFern http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-405 PredatoryFern Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:17:36 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-405 The article was originally on the fsckin.com site. Wayne, fsckin.com’s admin and writer, has been having issues w/ content thieves. I hope you guys can link to the correct source next time.

]]> By: OnHeL http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-402 OnHeL Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:07:36 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-402 This article can be found here now

http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/

]]> By: real_huh http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-378 real_huh Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:20:01 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=154#comment-378 I use smoothwall right now … it easy to use indeed .. but probably will switch to pfSense coz we will use load balancing… and … pfSense is the right choice in that situation … i guess :D

]]>