<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s new in FreeBSD 7.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pfsense.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173</link>
	<description>News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re starting with RELENG_7_0 (which is 7.0 + any security patches that might come out in the future), we won&#039;t put out releases on -STABLE branches (i.e. no RELENG_7). 

We&#039;re also moving to PHP 5, and working on fixing the many things the switch from PHP 4 to 5 broke. PHP 4 isn&#039;t going to receive security fixes that might be necessary for much longer. 

Still we should be testing a working pfSense 1.3/FreeBSD 7.0/PHP 5 setup in the next few days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re starting with RELENG_7_0 (which is 7.0 + any security patches that might come out in the future), we won&#8217;t put out releases on -STABLE branches (i.e. no RELENG_7). </p>
<p>We&#8217;re also moving to PHP 5, and working on fixing the many things the switch from PHP 4 to 5 broke. PHP 4 isn&#8217;t going to receive security fixes that might be necessary for much longer. </p>
<p>Still we should be testing a working pfSense 1.3/FreeBSD 7.0/PHP 5 setup in the next few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Walker</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be awesome if this was based off of upcoming releng_7 in May as that is when they want to merge xen support.  I&#039;d loved to be able to run pfsense in xen...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be awesome if this was based off of upcoming releng_7 in May as that is when they want to merge xen support.  I&#8217;d loved to be able to run pfsense in xen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Maybe RELENG_7_0 (this is not the 7.0 release) 

RELENG_7_0      is 7.0 + security patches
RELENG_7_0_0  is 7.0 without patches
RELENG_7         is 7-stable]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Maybe RELENG_7_0 (this is not the 7.0 release) </p>
<p>RELENG_7_0      is 7.0 + security patches<br />
RELENG_7_0_0  is 7.0 without patches<br />
RELENG_7         is 7-stable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe RELENG_7_0 (this is not the 7.0 release) would be the best choise for the next pfSense release and not 7-STABLE.

Best regards
db]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe RELENG_7_0 (this is not the 7.0 release) would be the best choise for the next pfSense release and not 7-STABLE.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned FreeBSD 7.0 is a production release and it would be great to have FreeBSD 7 as the base of pfSense 1.3.
However 7.0 is the first in line of a &quot;new technology&quot; branch, as 5.0 was and as 9.0 will be. So you should base 1.3 on 7-STABLE or 7.1

Best regards
db]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned FreeBSD 7.0 is a production release and it would be great to have FreeBSD 7 as the base of pfSense 1.3.<br />
However 7.0 is the first in line of a &#8220;new technology&#8221; branch, as 5.0 was and as 9.0 will be. So you should base 1.3 on 7-STABLE or 7.1</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhab12</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>mhab12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me too.  I&#039;m all for conservatism and stability, but it seems that FreeBSD 7 brings too much to the table to hang back on 6.3.  Thanks for keeping an open mind guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too.  I&#8217;m all for conservatism and stability, but it seems that FreeBSD 7 brings too much to the table to hang back on 6.3.  Thanks for keeping an open mind guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McGonigle</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McGonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;We’re trying out 1.3 on FreeBSD 7.0 to see how it goes.

That&#039;s such excellent news.  Major kudos, as always.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;We’re trying out 1.3 on FreeBSD 7.0 to see how it goes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s such excellent news.  Major kudos, as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark J Crane</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark J Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the effort in attempting PFSense 1.3 on FreeBSD 7. I look forward to additional news with great anticipation. Best Regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the effort in attempting PFSense 1.3 on FreeBSD 7. I look forward to additional news with great anticipation. Best Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re trying out 1.3 on FreeBSD 7.0 to see how it goes. I&#039;ll put up a new post here when we know more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re trying out 1.3 on FreeBSD 7.0 to see how it goes. I&#8217;ll put up a new post here when we know more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Hendriks</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173&#038;cpage=1#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Hendriks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=173#comment-797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well 7.0 is production ready if you may believe the freebsd website
Also it states that 6.x will be Legacy releases.

LATEST RELEASES

    * Production Release 7.0
    * Production (Legacy) Release 6.3

Just keep pfsense stable as it is now and i dont care if its running 6.x or 7.x
I run 7.0 on my mailscanner, web and mailserver  machines from the Beta&#039;s and it never let me down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well 7.0 is production ready if you may believe the freebsd website<br />
Also it states that 6.x will be Legacy releases.</p>
<p>LATEST RELEASES</p>
<p>    * Production Release 7.0<br />
    * Production (Legacy) Release 6.3</p>
<p>Just keep pfsense stable as it is now and i dont care if its running 6.x or 7.x<br />
I run 7.0 on my mailscanner, web and mailserver  machines from the Beta&#8217;s and it never let me down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
