<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pfSense 1.3 is now 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pfsense.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267</link>
	<description>News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-5834</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-5834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cant wait for the release of v 2.0 but i wonder will the feature for MAC address blocking be added, as this is a very important feature for a firewall !!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant wait for the release of v 2.0 but i wonder will the feature for MAC address blocking be added, as this is a very important feature for a firewall !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/timeline]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/timeline" rel="nofollow">http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/timeline</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stygma</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>stygma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where can the changelogs be found for 1.2.1 and 2.0?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can the changelogs be found for 1.2.1 and 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nilson Brito</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>Nilson Brito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Só de ter mudado a versão do sistema operacional para freebsd 7 já é suficiente, foram muitas as mudanças no código no novo pfsense! Estou usando a alguns meses, já implantei em mais de 3 filiais, e mais de 4 clientes. Estou muito satisfeito.

&lt;em&gt;Edit: translated from Portuguese by Google: &lt;/em&gt;
Just to have changed the version of the operating system for FreeBSD 7 is already sufficient, many changes in the new code pfsense! I&#039;m using a few months, has deployed by more than 3 branches, and more than 4 clients. I am very happy.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Só de ter mudado a versão do sistema operacional para freebsd 7 já é suficiente, foram muitas as mudanças no código no novo pfsense! Estou usando a alguns meses, já implantei em mais de 3 filiais, e mais de 4 clientes. Estou muito satisfeito.</p>
<p><em>Edit: translated from Portuguese by Google: </em><br />
Just to have changed the version of the operating system for FreeBSD 7 is already sufficient, many changes in the new code pfsense! I&#8217;m using a few months, has deployed by more than 3 branches, and more than 4 clients. I am very happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.2.x gets no new features. 

2.0 already contains automatic client configuration for OpenVPN, it compiles the user&#039;s configuration into a single Windows executable that installs the client and does the configuration automatically. 

AV in general is an overrated joke, especially at your network edge, but it may happen at some point. Mail proxy is another that may happen at some point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.2.x gets no new features. </p>
<p>2.0 already contains automatic client configuration for OpenVPN, it compiles the user&#8217;s configuration into a single Windows executable that installs the client and does the configuration automatically. </p>
<p>AV in general is an overrated joke, especially at your network edge, but it may happen at some point. Mail proxy is another that may happen at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darklogic</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>darklogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will there be any added features for 1.2 or 2.0 versions of pfSense that will have proxy based services such as. 
1.) Mail based proxies using spamassasin and claimAV.
2.) Web browsing security with ClaimAV and Antispyware.
3.) OpenVPN automatic client configuration file generator and deployment.
In other words, will you have addtional filtering solutions like Untangle, Endian, Clarkconnect, Smoothwall, ect...

I currently use pfSense as a edge firewall with Untangle running as a transparent bridge filtering system for phishing, spam, web filtering, AV, and reporting behind pfSense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will there be any added features for 1.2 or 2.0 versions of pfSense that will have proxy based services such as.<br />
1.) Mail based proxies using spamassasin and claimAV.<br />
2.) Web browsing security with ClaimAV and Antispyware.<br />
3.) OpenVPN automatic client configuration file generator and deployment.<br />
In other words, will you have addtional filtering solutions like Untangle, Endian, Clarkconnect, Smoothwall, ect&#8230;</p>
<p>I currently use pfSense as a edge firewall with Untangle running as a transparent bridge filtering system for phishing, spam, web filtering, AV, and reporting behind pfSense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The naming convention is messed up as things get converted over, it&#039;ll all be sorted out in the coming days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The naming convention is messed up as things get converted over, it&#8217;ll all be sorted out in the coming days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southman</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Southman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the changes I am a little confused.  Is RELENG_1 still the 2.0 (formerly 1.3) snapshot directory?  Then the pfSense-Full-UPdate-7-xxxxx would be the update to the main snapshot in that directory.  Why is there 1.2.1 RC2 snapshots in both directories?  

Could you implement a better naming convention for those of us that work with both the 1.2.1 and 2.0 snaps?  At the moment it is very difficult to know which is the 2.0 snapshot vs the 1.2.1 snapshot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the changes I am a little confused.  Is RELENG_1 still the 2.0 (formerly 1.3) snapshot directory?  Then the pfSense-Full-UPdate-7-xxxxx would be the update to the main snapshot in that directory.  Why is there 1.2.1 RC2 snapshots in both directories?  </p>
<p>Could you implement a better naming convention for those of us that work with both the 1.2.1 and 2.0 snaps?  At the moment it is very difficult to know which is the 2.0 snapshot vs the 1.2.1 snapshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BennTech</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>BennTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last half of 2009 for 2.0?? Ah, man...well, I guess I&#039;d rather have my firewall secure than rushed.

Maybe I should dust off my programming hat and help, though by the time I got up to speed with pfSense code &amp; BSD (I&#039;m a Windows man--don&#039;t hate me) you&#039;ll probably be on version 2.3.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last half of 2009 for 2.0?? Ah, man&#8230;well, I guess I&#8217;d rather have my firewall secure than rushed.</p>
<p>Maybe I should dust off my programming hat and help, though by the time I got up to speed with pfSense code &amp; BSD (I&#8217;m a Windows man&#8211;don&#8217;t hate me) you&#8217;ll probably be on version 2.3.  <img src='http://blog.pfsense.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267&#038;cpage=1#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=267#comment-2221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because other than the FreeBSD change, there is little changed in 1.2.1, strictly bug fixes and several changes required for the FreeBSD version change. 

Granted the switch to FreeBSD 7.0 is significant, but it&#039;s still coming off our RELENG_1_2 CVS branch so it will remain a 1.2.x release.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because other than the FreeBSD change, there is little changed in 1.2.1, strictly bug fixes and several changes required for the FreeBSD version change. </p>
<p>Granted the switch to FreeBSD 7.0 is significant, but it&#8217;s still coming off our RELENG_1_2 CVS branch so it will remain a 1.2.x release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
