<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you game?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pfsense.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=27" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=27</link>
	<description>News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:07:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaducahNix</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=27&#038;cpage=1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>PaducahNix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=27#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This feature is awesome, I&#039;ve been a long time user of m0n0wall and feeling it fell short in a few areas of a normally robust nature: I jumped on this after hearing about it. I&#039;ve setup rules for CS, BF2, and a few others, as well as giving my DNS &amp; web server higher priority, and lowering P2P...We&#039;ll see how this all works out in my LAN. I have a 6mb down and 768k up connection, I have 7 workstations and 11 machines on the lan using the connection via a rackmounted 24-port switch which is linked to the 600mhz pfSense box. Hopefully I will see performance gain in efficiency with the better prioritizing capabilities. Thanks to you guys, I&#039;ll be sure to check back from some feedback on how things are going after a week or so of heavy usage. Thanks again, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;--Hitman_Forhire]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This feature is awesome, I&#8217;ve been a long time user of m0n0wall and feeling it fell short in a few areas of a normally robust nature: I jumped on this after hearing about it. I&#8217;ve setup rules for CS, BF2, and a few others, as well as giving my DNS &#038; web server higher priority, and lowering P2P&#8230;We&#8217;ll see how this all works out in my LAN. I have a 6mb down and 768k up connection, I have 7 workstations and 11 machines on the lan using the connection via a rackmounted 24-port switch which is linked to the 600mhz pfSense box. Hopefully I will see performance gain in efficiency with the better prioritizing capabilities. Thanks to you guys, I&#8217;ll be sure to check back from some feedback on how things are going after a week or so of heavy usage. Thanks again, </p>
<p>&#8211;Hitman_Forhire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
