Comments on: 1.2.1 release schedule http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313 News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:07:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Dominik http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2556 Dominik Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:10:23 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2556 The checksum files at http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD7/RELENG_1_2/ for the RC3 are a little bit damaged.

You can find something like this:

SHA256 (/usr/obj.pfSense/pfSense-1.2.1-RC3-20081213-0649.iso.gz)

I think there should be no absolut path in this file.

Now I am going to install the RC3 on my new Soekris net5501 and test pfSense before the final release.

]]> By: Dennis http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2551 Dennis Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:58:21 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2551 Thank you thank you…

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2546 Chris Buechler Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:05:28 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2546 Joseph: Packages are not part of the base system, they are completely independent from any releases and are updated individually on their own.

]]> By: Jonathan http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2542 Jonathan Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:51:07 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2542 We use a large ERP suite that errs too far on the other side. We often see regressions, and things that surely couldn’t have passed basic testing. So for our part, we wholeheartedly support the pfsense approach!

]]> By: joseph karma http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2541 joseph karma Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:49:00 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2541 Keep the good work guys.
Just a question from a newbie: RC-2 had a bug on the snort package. Is it corrected on RC-3?
Cheers

]]> By: Belthazar http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2539 Belthazar Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:00:49 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2539 Will be the best Xmas gift in years! Thank you for the relentless effort & dedication in growing pfSense.

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2537 Chris Buechler Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:00:24 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2537 I agree, Kevin, we could have released this quite some time ago. We’re very conservative with our releases, perhaps too much so in this case. We just want to be completely sure that there are no regressions when we label something as a stable release, and at this point we’re already confident of that from the wide scale deployments of 1.2.1 over the past several months. We decided to give it one more RC, though we’re already confident that RC2 is a stable release.

]]> By: Kevin Bowling http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313&cpage=1#comment-2535 Kevin Bowling Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:44:05 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=313#comment-2535 Excellent! Sometimes I think you guys are too timid on releasing, 1.2.1 has been in good shape for a while :-) .

]]>