Comments on: Wow! http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39 News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project Fri, 17 May 2013 19:48:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Aderium http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39&cpage=1#comment-18 Aderium Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:31:00 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39#comment-18 Thanks for the explanation, pf is new to us but we support pfsense 100% !!

I ll learn more about CIDR summarized to know whats the better way for us to serve our needs, but thanks for the prompt answer.

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39&cpage=1#comment-15 Chris Buechler Sun, 17 Jul 2005 05:48:00 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39#comment-15 Nothing is broken, the functionality to use ranges was removed so if you have 5 IP’s that are contiguous and can’t be CIDR summarized, you now have to enter 5 separate proxy ARP rules rather than putting them all into one.

i.e. if you have public IP’s 12.200.1.5 through 12.200.1.10, you have to enter a rule for 12.200.1.5, another for 12.200.1.6, etc. etc. Previously you could tell it to use that range of .5 through .10.

]]> By: Aderium http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39&cpage=1#comment-14 Aderium Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:49:00 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=39#comment-14 Well, I have multiple static IP’s to set on my wan for different services and servers on my private network, so if that is what’s broken, yeah that’s an issue.

My ISP provides me with 5 IP addresses in the same subnet and all I have is one interface

]]>