<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 0.70.8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pfsense.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41</link>
	<description>News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dijital</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Dijital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any thought been given to like adding a quick port open or something or a quicklist for games?  and just out of curiosity if I wanted have (2) firewalls, one for my wan, and then one in front of my email server, then would I just forward POP3/SMTP/DNS to that 2nd router, and then from  there to mail server?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thought been given to like adding a quick port open or something or a quicklist for games?  and just out of curiosity if I wanted have (2) firewalls, one for my wan, and then one in front of my email server, then would I just forward POP3/SMTP/DNS to that 2nd router, and then from  there to mail server?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41#comment-23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Chris said, providing new packages is currently not high on our list of priorities. I&#039;m currently focusing on providing a stable and flexible backend along with documentation so people can make their own packages and submit them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Chris said, providing new packages is currently not high on our list of priorities. I&#8217;m currently focusing on providing a stable and flexible backend along with documentation so people can make their own packages and submit them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nagios, email servers, etc. should really all live on another box.  Installing them on your firewall is a BAD IDEA.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not to say we aren&#039;t going to have packages like that though.  Later down the road we even plan for a version that works with a single NIC to use in a server role.  Packages like that are better suited for a situation where you have another firewall in front of the device running them.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We don&#039;t recommend running everything on one box, but if you want to shoot yourself in the foot, we give you the ability to load the gun.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Packages are not a major focus of the development team at this point, while the core of the project is being worked on extensively.  Don&#039;t expect to see many or any packages added anytime soon.  You are of course welcome to submit patches to include them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nagios, email servers, etc. should really all live on another box.  Installing them on your firewall is a BAD IDEA.  </p>
<p>Not to say we aren&#8217;t going to have packages like that though.  Later down the road we even plan for a version that works with a single NIC to use in a server role.  Packages like that are better suited for a situation where you have another firewall in front of the device running them.  </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t recommend running everything on one box, but if you want to shoot yourself in the foot, we give you the ability to load the gun.  </p>
<p>Packages are not a major focus of the development team at this point, while the core of the project is being worked on extensively.  Don&#8217;t expect to see many or any packages added anytime soon.  You are of course welcome to submit patches to include them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dijital</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Dijital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@aderium great suggestion looks like a great package to add to this wonderful product if I must say!!&lt;br/&gt;I would like to see some type of email server integrated into this, possibly open-xchange, what you guys think?&lt;br/&gt;http://www.open-xchange.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@aderium great suggestion looks like a great package to add to this wonderful product if I must say!!<br />I would like to see some type of email server integrated into this, possibly open-xchange, what you guys think?<br /><a href="http://www.open-xchange.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.open-xchange.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aderium</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Aderium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi guys&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nice job really I am at 0.70.2 and ready to bump up... I was wondering.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Do you guys think Nagios could be implemented as a package ?  &lt;br/&gt;http://nagios.org&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Or should it sit somwhere else in the network.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is a great tool to complement the other ones]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys</p>
<p>Nice job really I am at 0.70.2 and ready to bump up&#8230; I was wondering.</p>
<p>Do you guys think Nagios could be implemented as a package ?  <br /><a href="http://nagios.org" rel="nofollow">http://nagios.org</a></p>
<p>Or should it sit somwhere else in the network.</p>
<p>It is a great tool to complement the other ones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dijital</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Dijital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=41#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Killer project!!  Like m0n0wall on overdrive!!&lt;br/&gt;I must say that I have just recently switched over from m0n0wall to pfsense, and I must say that I am looking forward to the future of pfsense and its development however I do have a few suggestions, where/who do I contact about these.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Killer project!!  Like m0n0wall on overdrive!!<br />I must say that I have just recently switched over from m0n0wall to pfsense, and I must say that I am looking forward to the future of pfsense and its development however I do have a few suggestions, where/who do I contact about these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
