<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: List of 2.0 New Features and Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pfsense.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560</link>
	<description>News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-13340</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-13340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pong: yes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pong: yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pong</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-13337</link>
		<dc:creator>pong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-13337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[same question 

Can we use the Load Balancing / Wan Failover with SQUID? I hope will be possible now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same question </p>
<p>Can we use the Load Balancing / Wan Failover with SQUID? I hope will be possible now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-11055</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-11055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we use the Load Balancing / Wan Failover with SQUID? I hope will be possible now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we use the Load Balancing / Wan Failover with SQUID? I hope will be possible now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-8435</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can see what&#039;s still remaining at redmine.pfsense.org. We expect RC1 soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see what&#8217;s still remaining at redmine.pfsense.org. We expect RC1 soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Reid</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-8434</link>
		<dc:creator>James Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Chris,

Can we have another status update on how far down the track 2.0 has reached?  Is it likely that it will still be released &quot;this year&quot;?  Can you give us a little insight into what&#039;s happening other than &quot;lot&#039;s of testing&quot;?

Is there anything that those of us who are more end users of pfsense can do to help?

I&#039;m trying to pitch this more in a &quot;please can you help us appreciate what&#039;s happening&quot; context!

Thanks.
James.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Can we have another status update on how far down the track 2.0 has reached?  Is it likely that it will still be released &#8220;this year&#8221;?  Can you give us a little insight into what&#8217;s happening other than &#8220;lot&#8217;s of testing&#8221;?</p>
<p>Is there anything that those of us who are more end users of pfsense can do to help?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to pitch this more in a &#8220;please can you help us appreciate what&#8217;s happening&#8221; context!</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-8231</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter: if you want to create a package, you&#039;re certainly welcome to submit one and we&#039;ll get it committed. If you want us to, if you&#039;re willing to pay for it we can definitely make that happen, just email me (cmb at pfsense dot org) to discuss further. Otherwise, we have no plans of adding that in the near future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter: if you want to create a package, you&#8217;re certainly welcome to submit one and we&#8217;ll get it committed. If you want us to, if you&#8217;re willing to pay for it we can definitely make that happen, just email me (cmb at pfsense dot org) to discuss further. Otherwise, we have no plans of adding that in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wu</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-8229</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Chris for the comments! 

But will it be possible to integrate the said WANProxy as a package in 2.0? If so, many people can enjoy this useful function.

Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Chris for the comments! </p>
<p>But will it be possible to integrate the said WANProxy as a package in 2.0? If so, many people can enjoy this useful function.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Buechler</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Buechler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter: sure, you can add that as a package.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter: sure, you can add that as a package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wu</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-8227</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-8227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Chris, a really powerful product that we like. Great job!

Our Pfsense firwall works very well here. And we do like your integrated Packages, like Squid, too. 

Now we&#039;re wondering whether it&#039;s fine to integrate the WANProxy into Pfsense as a Package? WANProxy runs well on FreeBSD platform so we believe that it should be OK to make smooth integration. It will be very helpful to accelerate certain applications via WAN transmission.
WANProxy&#039;s URL: http://wanproxy.org/

Thank you, Chris!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris, a really powerful product that we like. Great job!</p>
<p>Our Pfsense firwall works very well here. And we do like your integrated Packages, like Squid, too. </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re wondering whether it&#8217;s fine to integrate the WANProxy into Pfsense as a Package? WANProxy runs well on FreeBSD platform so we believe that it should be OK to make smooth integration. It will be very helpful to accelerate certain applications via WAN transmission.<br />
WANProxy&#8217;s URL: <a href="http://wanproxy.org/" rel="nofollow">http://wanproxy.org/</a></p>
<p>Thank you, Chris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evert Westman</title>
		<link>http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560&#038;cpage=3#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>Evert Westman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=560#comment-7877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have set up 4 pfsense system and everything running fine, for two of the system i have prepared indenticaly standby pfsense in case of failure.
Never used for two year....

Is it possible in 2.0 to import a local user database with prepared user password.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have set up 4 pfsense system and everything running fine, for two of the system i have prepared indenticaly standby pfsense in case of failure.<br />
Never used for two year&#8230;.</p>
<p>Is it possible in 2.0 to import a local user database with prepared user password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
