Comments on: 2.0.1 release now available! http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633 News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project Sat, 25 May 2013 21:29:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: George Mathieson http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-20737 George Mathieson Tue, 16 Apr 2013 06:57:14 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-20737 I can confirm that the Traffic Graph does not save it’s refresh interval.

]]> By: Pieter Jordaan http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15995 Pieter Jordaan Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:56:11 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15995 Brilliant!

I love seeing pfSense kick Cisco butt.

I just configured Site-to-Site VPN with compression, linked into a gateway group for fail-over. It is awesome!

Keep up the good work guys.

]]> By: james bruce http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15990 james bruce Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:05:54 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15990 are there simple basic downloads for the uninformed?

]]> By: Rexhepi http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15931 Rexhepi Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:41:10 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15931 Great job , thanks

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15807 Chris Buechler Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:23:23 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15807 Arcel: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Is_there_IPv6_support_available

]]> By: Arcel de Ocampo http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15806 Arcel de Ocampo Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:12:30 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15806 Once again, great work! The biggest question for me is When IPV6 will be officially included?

thanks!!!

]]> By: mahmut ay http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15753 mahmut ay Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:33:31 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15753 good job , thanks to everybody

]]> By: Ernest http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15735 Ernest Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:16:18 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15735 I’m still love it, great Job PFSense Team! ;-)

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15661 Chris Buechler Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:16:51 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15661 Paul: Yes, pfSense does serve as the firewalls in numerous PCI compliant environments, including some very high transaction level ones that get the highest levels of auditor scrutiny, so it’s definitely a suitable platform. PCI is about a lot more than what firewall you use though. Post to the forum or list to get into more detailed discussion, and maybe get some feedback from users who have PCI compliant networks.

]]> By: Paul M http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633&cpage=1#comment-15657 Paul M Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:58 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633#comment-15657 Hello,
I changed jobs recently and am unfortunately managing some Cisco PIX.

When we move offices I would like to build new firewalls using pfSense, but we need some level of PCI-DSS compliance. As far as I can see pfSense ticks the right boxes, but I would like some confirmation that there is no reason not to use it.

]]>