Comments on: 2.0.2 Release Now Available! http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676 News, reviews and more related to the pfSense firewall project Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:07:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Marcello http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=2#comment-20545 Marcello Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:42:35 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-20545 A 1.2.3 instance on an old mini-tower pc is still doing great after almost 1 year of continuous uptime! Looking forward to install a new shiny 2.0.2 box asap.

]]> By: Thet Paing http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=2#comment-20536 Thet Paing Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:15:43 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-20536 What a truly excellent firewall….

Great stuff, thank you very much!

]]> By: ekalil http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=2#comment-20368 ekalil Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:50:43 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-20368 Great Jobs! Tks guys!!! ;)

]]> By: Paul Ansell http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=2#comment-20150 Paul Ansell Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:04:46 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-20150 What a find, a truly excellent firewall – totally thrilled with it, how i never came across it earlier i don’t know. Absolutely love it, just seems to have everything, and it’s doddle to config – it just works!!!

Fantastic stuff, thank you very much!!

]]> By: George Stancu http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=2#comment-20146 George Stancu Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:17:45 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-20146 Great job guys… thank you for the best firewall……

]]> By: Chris Buechler http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=2#comment-20013 Chris Buechler Sun, 03 Feb 2013 07:29:26 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-20013 Simon: that’s part of what we can do with PBIs going forward.

]]> By: Simon http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=1#comment-19987 Simon Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:18:28 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-19987 In the future, can you perhaps make use of digital signatures and/or approved lists based on sha256 checking for packages? A big fat warning for those unapproved, of course….

Thanks!

]]> By: Paul http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=1#comment-19626 Paul Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:13:25 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-19626 Superb product, from whichever way you you look it. And yes, upgrades are mostly solid. I just upgraded one box between 2.1 beta revisions and another box from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2. Both went well. I did have some ipv6 addressing issues after the 2.1 update when creating a new interface. I haven’t looked into it so take that with a pinch of salt :)

]]> By: Ferdi KÜÇÜK http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=1#comment-19500 Ferdi KÜÇÜK Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:50:08 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-19500 Thank You..

]]> By: Neter http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676&cpage=1#comment-19102 Neter Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:12:40 +0000 http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=676#comment-19102 Upgrade went smoothly. Thanks.

]]>