Nice review from someone unrelated to the project.
“In the end, pfSense is ultimately the best choice overall and provides the best value of all we have looked at today.”
This entry was posted
by Chris Buechler on Friday, November 16th, 2007 at 11:16 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
November 28th, 2007 at 12:20 am
I use smoothwall right now … it easy to use indeed .. but probably will switch to pfSense coz we will use load balancing… and … pfSense is the right choice in that situation … i guess
December 6th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
This article can be found here now
http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/
December 7th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
The article was originally on the fsckin.com site. Wayne, fsckin.com’s admin and writer, has been having issues w/ content thieves. I hope you guys can link to the correct source next time.
December 7th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
Post URL updated, thanks to those who pointed out the correct source. The originally linked URL is what Google Alerts found and that’s how I came across it, I didn’t realize it was plagiarized.
December 8th, 2007 at 4:38 pm
Just found this, good to know that you’re already linking to my site instead of this bastard who keeps grabbing my content – lol.
January 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Surprisingly no mention of Untangle.
It’s nice to see pfSense in a review, it’s a bit concerning that many of the other firewalls are turning into chunky master-of-none appliances.
January 17th, 2008 at 9:34 am
I know it’s late, but thanks Chris for correcting the URL.